Archive for the ‘Portfolios’ category

Market/Portfolio Update

December 14th, 2009

Finals coming up, and according my portfolio activity will be a little sporadic. I originally was going to do a post on the Google/Apple rivalry that seems to be heating up combined with a few updates and actually wrote most of it.. but I didn’t feel like it had enough meat in it yet to post and my all-nighter is making me too spacey to finish it. So I figured I’d just get the update out.

A few quick things first though which I wanted to highlight. The first is the very, very easy way to follow this blog (or any blog). Just go to www.feedmyinbox.com, type in the site of the blog and your e-mail and voila! You get notified when posts go up. It’s not real-time (will only update once a day per RSS feed to avoid spamming your inbox on the more hyperactive blogs/news feeds), but it’s very handy. And before some wise guy tries to sign me up for some random site, there is a confirmation e-mail that gets sent out :P

Also, I’d very much encourage people to ask questions. The tougher the better really, since if we don’t get people picking at our ideas they don’t get fully developed. It’s always nice to get a fresh perspective because without it we can get caught in our own circular feedback loop. You think gold will rally? Sure, make a convincing argument. Think the semiconductor market is going to stagnate in 2010? I’d love to know what supports that view.

» Read more: Market/Portfolio Update

Portfolio Update

December 11th, 2009

Seems that debt stricken companies (unfortunately in some cases even sovereigns) subdued in strength to generate cash and support creditor payments are having a tough time. One interesting example is MGM which paired in a glut expansion that is hard to sustain. Pairing up with Dubai World in Las Vegas City Center does not sound like a winning strategy. It will be hard to maintain their poker face with 15B in LTD on their balance sheet and with a credit line maxed up by bankers; the only thing they can to is to keep keep rolling the dices–unfortunately, the odds seem to be against the house this time–

Shorted 1500 shares this week.

Midweek Update

December 3rd, 2009

Hey guys, originally this was going to be posted yesterday but because Roadrunner decided to crap out as I was writing this, no salami. Actually, not a terrible thing because I’ll just tack on today’s trades as well.

VXX – I sold out of the position Monday night after the rally in imp. volatility (Dubai). Mostly because it seems to be the way of the market to let things settle until the end of the year. And as predicted, Dubai was not nearly as big a scare to put a permanent dent or concern in the market. Turns out to have been a decent exit time since the VXX has sloped downwards the past few days. As I’ve said, I’ll very likely be re-entering this position late December. If this sounds like a trade more than a value pick, keep in mind that the VXX isn’t an actual company, or ETF of commodities/sectors. I’m using it as a pure hedge, so this is the one exception to the rule of trying to get into traders’ heads.

DSX – Increased the position slightly to max it out at 15%, wasn’t able to do so before due to lack of cash but now the portfolio seems to be in the opposite extreme.

ELON – I like this company, I really do. But the uncertainty with so many municipalities running into budget crises has shaken it (at least, that’s the best explanation I can deduce). And that doesn’t seem to be shaping up anytime soon. The smart grid stimulus package notwithstanding I’m very concerned about how the stock seems to be more a trader’s hot potato than anything related to the company. Note just today how the stock dropped $1.02, only to rise $1.02 after hours. So, I took the opportunity tonight to cut the headache and leave it out. Unfortunately, it seems I entered the trade for 11/03 instead of 12/03 so the sell shows up a month back :-/. I’m not sure if I’m going to consider this company again. Given the even higher expected volatility after the year end, probably not. It’s valuation is slippery because it’s basically a growth company currently operating with losses. Would I pick it up again at 9-10 to hold for 5 years? Certainly. But this is the type of company I don’t think will fit particularly well for the Initiative.

TIF – Relating back to the last post where I discussed the new outlook, this is the first buy on it. I feel like I may have written too much emphasis on the commodities/USD on the outlook, because the way I look at it is it’s the icing I’m looking for to find strong companies, if that makes sense. Tiffany’s is a company that I personally like quite a bit (as a stock, not merchandise). It has in some ways the best possible jewelry niche. Think of it this way – Tiffany’s is a brand that a lot of people can and will splurge on, especially as a gift. From that perspective, it’s a luxury brand with broad appeal. On the other hand, it’s not exactly cheap, and for that reason it scales very well in that it’s rare a piece from them won’t be “good enough”. For the company itself, the valuation is definitely not cheap but it’s not expensive either at 20x forward P/E. Bought into it a few days ago, and now with more cash I’m maxing out the position.

Post-Thanksgiving Madness

November 28th, 2009

Wow, so much has happened in such a short time. Did anyone think that Dubai would run into liquidity problems? Some, probably. But probably not to the degree it occurred. The fact that Abu Dhabi is reluctant to fully bail out the creditors is significant, not the least of which is because it means banks can no longer pump debt into Dubai despite its heavy leverage and assume payments are virtually guaranteed. Anyway, I’ll let someone else flesh out the story with more details because I don’t want this post to drag out too long. One thing I will clarify though, as I’ve expressed before the market’s surged too quickly too far. The rise in the stock market is not commensurate with actual economic recovery, even taking its forward looking nature into account. So is this the surprise that corrects the market? I’ll have to go with no. It’s certainly possible, but I’m thinking it’ll take a lot more than 59B from a sovereign corporation already known to be debt heavy to send the market into tailspin. As a piece of  the harbinger, perhaps. But not in itself.

The portfolio will be undergoing quite a few shifts the coming week, and a new (bolder) outlook after the break!

» Read more: Post-Thanksgiving Madness

All-Star Update

November 19th, 2009

Finally All-Star portfolio has made it to the blog.

I will provide you with a short update on today’s trades.

Firstly, I will cash out on some of my position in PCX. Stock soared post earnings as they provided great outlook. They expect to contract more for Chinese exports, they modified some of the quality mix of the coal so that they can take advantage of better prices going thorough the next year. Additionally, management declared they have a high degree of operational leverage for their metallurgical coal production and can increase production from 5M tons/year to 9.5M tons/year. I believe the stock might depress a bit more before it stabilizes.

Also with TNP I am taking some money off the table as it seems that the stock is reaching it’s 3 months resistance point of ~17. If it falls again, i’ll pick up again more shares as I did when it traded around 15 and gave us the returns we have.

So far, so good.

See you guys Friday!!!

Portfolio Update

November 14th, 2009

This will just be a quick post to go more into detail about last week’s trades.

First off: I sold out of BEP (S&P500 Covered Call Fund). I fully admit this ETF didn’t hedge downside in any way I expected. And by that I mean it didn’t hedge downside at all. If the market went up, it underperformed, if the market went down it underperformed. Very frustrating, because at least the way I looked at it it’s supposed to do well when it’s an uncertain, not too strong bull market (people want to buy calls, but don’t want to commit by buying stocks). Which has pretty much been the situation since it’s been in the portfolio.

Diana like I keep repeating is a company and stock I really love and barring some catastrophe will be in the portfolio at the end of the year. The main reason I sold out of it was a quasi-trading play, because the day after it rose to 16% on a day of extremely positive trading I was pretty sure some would cash out their gains. Hence, I sold it that night, DSX did indeed fall slightly the next day and I repurchased it at that price. It wasn’t value fare admittedly, but at this point any outperformance is valuable.

However, to quickly renumerate just how strong Diana is – it has a pristine balance sheet (23% leverage vs 90-150% for almost every other shipper), meaning even now it can raise debt very cheaply and easily. It has a substantial cash position, enough to straight out buy 4 more capesize vessels. But with 50/50 it easily has the ability to purchase up to 8 if necessary. On top of that, they have a 99.7% fleet utilization rate (only .2% dropoff from last year) and an average age of 5 years on its fleet meaning very low maintenance and upgrading costs moving forward. And it has a number of charters coming off in the next few months so they can take advantage of the surging BDI.

» Read more: Portfolio Update

First Initiative Blog Post!

November 4th, 2009

3…2…1… Liftoff! Alright so this is going to be my first blog post, going to start it off with just some random musings since I didn’t have anything planned (and our presentation is taking up chunks of free time). So, here goes.

Everyone was buzzing about Buffett’s deal for Burlington Northern yesterday. Every financial newspaper rolled out the obligatory article with some variation of “is Burlington Northern worth this valuation?” or analyzing the cash/stock ratio of the deal. With all due respect, they’re missing the point. I don’t doubt that Buffett has a very good valuation of the company, and I’ve been bullish on transportation myself (obligatory tooting of my own horn). My question is why did Buffett choose Burlington Northern? It’s not the only railroad with a large rail system in the Midwest-West. In fact, of the 4 largest railroads (CSX, Union Pacific, BNI, NSC) you have an even split of CSX/NSC in the East and BNI/UNP in the West.

So I’m going to try to follow Buffett’s perspective here. First off, the Western two railroads have an inherent advantage of terrain. Why? The sheer amount of land they cover is much, much larger as well as touches the Gulf and Pacific. I’ll get into why that’s advantageous in a moment. If you’re not sure that it actually is larger, hark back to 3rd grade Social Studies when you learned about the Louisiana Purchase and subsequent land grabs. Alternatively, here’s a handy picture ripped straight from Union Pacific’s Annual Report.

West Bigger than East » Read more: First Initiative Blog Post!