
And on that bombshell, have a wonderful Thanksgiving everyone!!
Finally All-Star portfolio has made it to the blog.
I will provide you with a short update on today’s trades.
Firstly, I will cash out on some of my position in PCX. Stock soared post earnings as they provided great outlook. They expect to contract more for Chinese exports, they modified some of the quality mix of the coal so that they can take advantage of better prices going thorough the next year. Additionally, management declared they have a high degree of operational leverage for their metallurgical coal production and can increase production from 5M tons/year to 9.5M tons/year. I believe the stock might depress a bit more before it stabilizes.
Also with TNP I am taking some money off the table as it seems that the stock is reaching it’s 3 months resistance point of ~17. If it falls again, i’ll pick up again more shares as I did when it traded around 15 and gave us the returns we have.
So far, so good.
See you guys Friday!!!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aQz3J1NVh0wI
Extended low fed funds rate potentially causing another crisis..in Asia? This time it is the dollar liquidity sparking carry trade, not the yen.
For more on the Asian bubble:
http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-news/151587-asia-in-a-bubble-what-bubble.html
This will just be a quick post to go more into detail about last week’s trades.
First off: I sold out of BEP (S&P500 Covered Call Fund). I fully admit this ETF didn’t hedge downside in any way I expected. And by that I mean it didn’t hedge downside at all. If the market went up, it underperformed, if the market went down it underperformed. Very frustrating, because at least the way I looked at it it’s supposed to do well when it’s an uncertain, not too strong bull market (people want to buy calls, but don’t want to commit by buying stocks). Which has pretty much been the situation since it’s been in the portfolio.
Diana like I keep repeating is a company and stock I really love and barring some catastrophe will be in the portfolio at the end of the year. The main reason I sold out of it was a quasi-trading play, because the day after it rose to 16% on a day of extremely positive trading I was pretty sure some would cash out their gains. Hence, I sold it that night, DSX did indeed fall slightly the next day and I repurchased it at that price. It wasn’t value fare admittedly, but at this point any outperformance is valuable.
However, to quickly renumerate just how strong Diana is – it has a pristine balance sheet (23% leverage vs 90-150% for almost every other shipper), meaning even now it can raise debt very cheaply and easily. It has a substantial cash position, enough to straight out buy 4 more capesize vessels. But with 50/50 it easily has the ability to purchase up to 8 if necessary. On top of that, they have a 99.7% fleet utilization rate (only .2% dropoff from last year) and an average age of 5 years on its fleet meaning very low maintenance and upgrading costs moving forward. And it has a number of charters coming off in the next few months so they can take advantage of the surging BDI.

Guidelines:
Submission Standards:
3…2…1… Liftoff! Alright so this is going to be my first blog post, going to start it off with just some random musings since I didn’t have anything planned (and our presentation is taking up chunks of free time). So, here goes.
Everyone was buzzing about Buffett’s deal for Burlington Northern yesterday. Every financial newspaper rolled out the obligatory article with some variation of “is Burlington Northern worth this valuation?” or analyzing the cash/stock ratio of the deal. With all due respect, they’re missing the point. I don’t doubt that Buffett has a very good valuation of the company, and I’ve been bullish on transportation myself (obligatory tooting of my own horn). My question is why did Buffett choose Burlington Northern? It’s not the only railroad with a large rail system in the Midwest-West. In fact, of the 4 largest railroads (CSX, Union Pacific, BNI, NSC) you have an even split of CSX/NSC in the East and BNI/UNP in the West.
So I’m going to try to follow Buffett’s perspective here. First off, the Western two railroads have an inherent advantage of terrain. Why? The sheer amount of land they cover is much, much larger as well as touches the Gulf and Pacific. I’ll get into why that’s advantageous in a moment. If you’re not sure that it actually is larger, hark back to 3rd grade Social Studies when you learned about the Louisiana Purchase and subsequent land grabs. Alternatively, here’s a handy picture ripped straight from Union Pacific’s Annual Report.

Welcome to the new IAG blog. Our main website is great for posting events, presentations, workshops, and more. However, it’s so not great for with interacting with you, our members.
In the past we’ve had separate blogs for the two portfolio managers. Visiting three different sites for a club (SternIAG.com and two blogs) is inconvenient and slightly confusing. This year we are consolidating the blogs.
The portfolio managers will discuss their investment rationales, as they have done in the past. Moreover, the PMs, the Newsletter Committee, and the board will contribute articles pertaining to finance and investing. We encourage you to comment on this blog.
If you’re interested, the old blogs from 2007-08 are here: